Linways Technologies
OCTOBER 30, 2020
But still, there are miles to go when it comes to fully adapt to online learning. More often than not, the quick online transition left little room for critical analysis and side-by-side comparison of the digital tools used for online learning. Simply transferring your work online is not ideal.
Dangerously Irrelevant
OCTOBER 24, 2022
Scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) are down after the pandemic. Indeed, it’s so aspirational that most states are not trying to reach that level with their annual assessments. Phillips set out to map NAEP benchmarks onto international assessments in science and mathematics. . emphasis added].
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kitaboo on EdTech
JUNE 19, 2018
Though classroom learning is still preferred as a mode of teaching in many institutes, the popularity of online learning is slowly overshadowing traditional learning. college students find digital learning technologies helpful. As per Statista, 43% of U.S
Edsurge
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Learning loss is everywhere—and so are reports detailing the setbacks. And “non-traditional” students appear more okay with remote online learning than their “traditional” peers. Its measurement gathered up “more than one million” fall screenings given using its FastBridge adaptive assessments going back to fall 2016.
MIND Research Institute
MARCH 9, 2021
A novel study released by Proving Ground , part of the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University, found increasing ST Math use by more than 10 minutes per week correlated with higher math gains on multiple state standardized math assessments.
Neo LMS
OCTOBER 16, 2018
Transferring your lesson data online via pdf printables, perhaps a video and then some text would not yet capture the discursive, investigative element of the original lesson. The online learning environment features wonderfully fast and nimble feedback loops. That is not to say however, that it cannot be created.
EdNews Daily
JUNE 7, 2018
Most tests are designed to make efficient comparisons between groups , not tell us about individuals. Group comparisons are valuable because they give us data about curriculum efficacy and how to allocate funding. We can best measure individual growth with authentic tests that are integrated into learning. Be involved.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content